With a single long exposure you’d have to gradually adjust your aperture over time to fade the stars in or out for comet trails. Comet trails are much easier to create by stacking images. In film days we had to do a single exposure, but digital opens up new opportunities.Ħ. This alone is the best reason for stacking multiple shorter exposures in my opinion. A dead battery, tripod vibration, something walking in front of the lens, clouds in the sky, an unexpected light source like car headlights, and a host of other unexpected things could ruin an entire long exposure, but only screw up a few frames with the stacking method, particularly if it's at the end or beginning of a timelapse. Of course, you can manually blend layers in Photoshop with either method of shooting so this isn’t a big deal.ĥ. Lit up objects will not show up much at all in a single long exposure (figure 10 to 30 seconds of light out of a total of 30 minutes-barely visible), but many stacking methods will grab the brightest pixels of each frame and blend it properly. The same is true for blending in things you might want to include like trees or other foreground objects lit up by light painting or vehicles driving by. It’s much easier to clone out airplane trails and other objects that get in your image from a bunch of short exposures vs. Using this dark frame method lets you disable long exposure noise reduction on all the rest of the shots cutting your shooting time in half.ģ. It's important to do this right before or after your timelapse so you have the same ambient temperature on your sensor. Instead you can shoot a "dark frame" of just the hot pixels by putting the lens cap on and shooting at f/22 but keeping the same ISO and shutter speed, then apply that dark frame to all the other timelapse frames via PixelFixer (free) on the RAW files before importing into Lightroom or editing. Shooting a half hour exposure and then waiting for a half hour long exposure noise reduction is a colossal waste of time and battery power. Long exposure noise reduction is different from high ISO noise reduction, and the longer the shutter is open the more hot pixels you will get. Noise reduction is a lot easier with a bunch of shorter exposures vs. At 24fps or 30fps, you’re going to need to take a lot of 30 second exposures to get a 5 to 10 second video clip, but it leaves the option open if you shoot enough frames. If you ever want to render a timelapse video, obviously you will need multiple frames vs. There is no right or wrong method to shooting star trails, but I prefer stacking over a single long exposure and here are some of my reasons why:ġ. Many remotes also have an intervalometer function such as the Promote Control. Shooting a timelapse to stack images is a little more sophisticated and requires an intervalometer that is either built into most Nikons or can be run on many Canons via Magic Lantern. Shooting a single long exposure is easier if you have a simple remote that supports locking the shutter open in bulb mode. Startrail latest version: Make your mouse leave a trail of stars.I often get asked, is it better to shoot a single long exposure for star trails, or stack several shorter exposures from a timelapse. Startrail for Mac, free and safe download. This is a good little video on YouTube showing how to stack the images using both the. There is also a great free script written by 'Russell Brown' called 'Stack-a-Matic' that you can link into Photoshop CS5/6 to do this too. There is a very cool FREE PROGRAM (for both Mac and PC) called 'StarStaX' which makes combining your images dead easy. This shows the clear sky chart for the Athabasca Glacier in Jasper, Alberta and you can see by the legend there is essentially 90-100% cloud cover for the entire forecast period with the exception. The gallery of PICOLAY images has been updated with lots of old and new 3D images:). Snail shell (Littorina) → Click for larger view Tips & News New Two new English YouTube Tutorials explaining: Focus stacking and the meaning of the stacking parameters. Focus stacking, image processing, 3D, and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |